Google Links

Follow the links below to find material targeted to the unit's elements, performance criteria, required skills and knowledge

Elements and Performance Criteria

  1. Identify objectives and strategies
  2. Evaluate strategies
  3. Select strategies

Evidence Required

The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria Required Skills and Knowledge the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Assessment must confirm the ability to

conduct risk assessment

ensure strategies meet identified objectives

select and correctly apply appropriate models

provide justification for the selection for the recommended strategies

Consistency in performance

Competency should be demonstrated over time in a range of actual or simulated workplace environments

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Context of assessment

Competency should be assessed in two or more incident situations or scenarios where there is the capacity to demonstrate the required evidence

Specific resources for assessment

Access is required to

workplace environment andor simulations based on actual incidents

resources that may involve complex scenarios sufficient to allow evidence to be gathered from a variety of sources and stakeholders on more than one occasion and over an extended period

Method of assessment

In a public safety environment assessment is usually conducted via direct observation in a training environment or in the workplace via subject matter supervision andor mentoring which is typically recorded in a competency workbook

Assessment is completed using appropriately qualified assessors who select the most appropriate method of assessment

Assessment may occur in an operational environment or in an agencyapproved simulated work environment Forms of assessment that are typically used include

direct observation

interviewing the candidate

journals and workplace documentation

third party reports from supervisors

written or oral questions


Range Statement

The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below.

Risk characteristics must include:

risk management concepts, principles and guidelines as defined in the current Australian Standard

Incidents must include:

incidents covered by organisational legislative responsibility

Sources of risk must include:

control activities

human behaviour

management activities

and may also include:

fire

flood

hazardous materials

structural collapse

Strategic options must include:

contingency

defensive

direct attack

indirect attack

offensive

parallel attack

Tactics may include:

back burning

construction of fire line by hand, machine or aircraft

fixed sprinklers

hose line

overhead attack

ventilation

Evaluation of tactics may include:

deficiencies and limitations

determination of advantages

disadvantages

Predictions may include:

incident behaviour and control models

local knowledge

suppression and fire control line construction models

weather predictive models

wind plume model

Resource requirements may include:

access to location

availability of specialist personnel

equipment requirements

expected duration of the incident

range of control options available

Consequences may include:

cost

date/time of control

impact on environment

local community and economy

probability of success

Stakeholders may include:

community groups

industry groups

land managers

local business

members of parliament

members of the public

non-government organisations

other response organisations

recovery agencies

support agencies

Information sources may include:

emergency management arrangements

emergency management plans

hazard assessments

response plans

risk assessments